You are here:

L. Eric Huang

Associate Professor of Neurosurgery and
Adjunct Associate Professor of Oncological Sciences

Eric Huang

M.D. Shanghai Medical University, China

Ph.D. Rutgers University

Research

References

eric.huang@hsc.utah.edu

Eric Huang's Lab Page

Eric Huang's PubMed Literature Search

Eric Huang's Google Scholar

Molecular Biology Program

Brain tumor; cancer metabolism; epigenetic and genetic alterations; hypoxia; tumor progression

Research

The Huang Lab focuses on identifying underlying mechanisms of glioma progression with the goal of providing novel therapeutic targets for glioma patients. Malignant gliomas arise from glial cells of origin and represent 81% of primary brain malignancy and cause significant mortality and morbidity. Glioblastoma—World Health Organization (WHO) grade IV, the most common and advanced form of glioma—has a 5-year survival of only 5.5%, whereas recurrence and progression of WHO grade II and grade III (lower-grade) gliomas contribute disproportionately to high mortality and morbidity. Despite an all-out effort with surgical resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, the mortality rates of malignant glioma remain unchanged for the last four decades.

IDH1 mutation in glioma

The cytosolic isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 gene (IDH1) catalyzes the conversion of isocitrate and NADP+ to 2-oxoglutarate and NADPH. Somatic heterozygous IDH1 mutations occur in >70% of the lower-grade gliomas and secondary glioblastomas, substituting arginine 132 with histidine at a frequency of 92% among gliomas with the mutation. The mutant enzyme requires the remaining allele of wild-type IDH1 for the conversion of 2-oxoglutarate and NADPH to D-2-hydroxyglutarate (D-2HG), a potent inhibitor of 2-oxoglutarate-dependent histone demethylases and the TET family of 5-methylcytosine hydroxylases. Consequently, IDH-mutant gliomas exhibit a CpG island methylator phenotype resulting from histone and DNA hypermethylation. Although IDH1 mutation is believed to drive gliomagenesis via D-2HG mediated epigenetic alterations, the median overall survival of glioma patients with IDH1 mutations is 2—3 times longer than those without mutation. Nevertheless, patients with IDH1 mutations still succumb to the malignancy despite the association with improved outcome. It is also noteworthy that IDH1 mutations are rare or non-existent in other type of brain tumors, let alone outside the central nervous system.

A contrarian hypothesis

We have proposed a contrarian hypothesis that heterozygous IDH1 mutation is intrinsically tumor suppressive and beneficial to the patient through a series of studies; however, this theory seems unfathomable because how on earth hotspot mutations in cancer are tumor suppressive and genetically preserved throughout glioma progression. Our further studies have demonstrated that the tumor-suppressive activity of IDH1 mutation is in fact undermined by various intracellular and extracellular factors, notably the neurotransmitter glutamate—abundant in the frontal lobe—as well as the inactivation of tumor-suppressor genes, selection against IDH1 heterozygosity, and reducing equivalents. Therefore, this dynamic hypothesis not only provides an explanation for the genetic preservation of IDH1 mutations throughout glioma development and progression but also accounts for the prevalence of IDH1 mutations specifically in glioma and the beneficial effect to these patients. Importantly, these studies are guiding us to explore novel therapeutic targets for patients.

Glioma metabolism

Metabolic reprogramming is an adaptive response critical for the survival and proliferation of cancer cells through the reduction of glucose oxidation (the Warburg effect) and diversion of glycolytic metabolites for the synthesis of macromolecules. The mitochondrial pyruvate carrier (MPC) protein complex, consisting of MPC1 and MPC2, is essential for pyruvate transport into mitochondria. In most human cancers, MPC1 is frequently deleted or down-regulated and, furthermore, the MPC activity is low, which is consistent with the concept of Warburg effect. The role of MPC in malignant glioma, however, seems more complex, as indicated by our bioinformatics analysis of patient data and experimental data. We hypothesize the cerebral cortex provides a unique microenvironment for tumor cell survival and we are actively testing this hypothesis in order to identify metabolic vulnerabilities of glioma cells that can be used for therapeutic intervention.

Tumor hypoxia

Previous studies from my lab and others have indicated a critical role for hypoxia (low oxygen tension) in malignant progression. We first demonstrated in cell culture models that the hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α), a master regulator of oxygen homeostasis, induces genetic alterations by inhibiting DNA repair. At the molecular level, we identified a novel mechanism that accounts for the hypoxic suppression of DNA repair via the Myc pathway. To demonstrate in vivo effects of HIF-1α on genetic alteration, we are employing mouse genetic models to test our hypothesis that HIF-1α drives glioma progression by inducing genetic alteration.

References

  1. Huang, LE (2019) Friend or foe—IDH1 mutations in glioma ten years on. Carcinogenesis. doi: 1093/carcin/bgz134
  2. Tiburcio PDB, Xiao B, Chai Y, Asper S, Tripp SR, Gillespie DL, Jensen RL, Huang LE. IDH1R132H is intrinsically tumor-suppressive but functionally attenuated by the glutamate-rich cerebral environment. Oncotarget. 2018 Oct 12;9(80):35100-35113. doi: 18632/oncotarget.26203. PubMed PMID: 30416682
  3. Karsy M, Guan J, Huang LE. Prognostic role of mitochondrial pyruvate carrier in isocitrate dehydrogenase-mutant glioma. J Neurosurg. 2018 Mar 16;130(1):56-66. doi: 3171/2017.9.JNS172036. PubMed PMID: 29547090.
  4. Tiburcio PDB, Xiao B, Berg S, Asper S, Lyne S, Zhang Y, Zhu X, Yan H, Huang LE. Functional requirement of a wild-type allele for mutant IDH1 to suppress anchorage-independent growth through redox homeostasis. Acta Neuropathol. 2018 Feb;135(2):285-298. doi: 1007/s00401-017-1800-0. PubMed PMID: 29288440.
  5. Tiburcio PDB, Lyne SB, Huang LE. In Vivo manipulation of HIF-1α expression during glioma genesis. Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1742:227-235. doi: 1007/978-1-4939-7665-2_20. PubMed PMID: 29330804.
  6. Huang LE, Cohen AL, Colman H, Jensen RL, Fults DW, Couldwell WT. IGFBP2 expression predicts IDH-mutant glioma patient survival. Oncotarget. 2017 Jan 3;8(1):191-202. doi: 18632/oncotarget.13329. PubMed PMID: 27852048.
  7. Karsy M, Guan J, Jensen R, Huang LE, Colman H. The impact of hypoxia and mesenchymal transition on glioblastoma pathogenesis and cancer stem cells regulation. World Neurosurg. 2016 Apr;88:222-36. doi: 1016/j.wneu.2015.12.032. PubMed PMID: 26724617.
  8. Choi H, Gillespie DL, Berg S, Rice C, Couldwell S, Gu J, Colman H, Jensen RL, Huang LE. Intermittent induction of HIF-1α produces lasting effects on malignant progression independent of its continued expression. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 20;10(4):e0125125. doi: 1371/journal.pone.0125125. PubMed PMID: 25893706.
  9. Tiburcio PD, Choi H, Huang LE. Complex role of HIF in cancer: the known, the unknown, and the unexpected. Hypoxia (Auckl). 2014 Jun 18;2:59-70. doi: 2147/HP.S50651. PubMed PMID: 27774467.
  10. Huang LE. Biochemistry. How HIF-1α handles stress. Science. 2013 Mar 15;339(6125):1285-6. doi: 1126/science.1236966. PubMed PMID: 23493703.
  11. Yoo YG, Christensen J, Gu J, Huang LE. HIF-1α mediates tumor hypoxia to confer a perpetual mesenchymal phenotype for malignant progression. Sci Signal. 2011 Jun 21;4(178):pt4. doi: 1126/scisignal.2002072. PubMed PMID: 21693763.
  12. Huang LE. Carrot and stick: HIF-α engages c-Myc in hypoxic adaptation. Cell Death Differ. 2008 Apr;15(4):672-7. doi: 1038/sj.cdd.4402302. PubMed PMID: 18188166.
  13. Huang LE, Bindra RS, Glazer PM, Harris AL. Hypoxia-induced genetic instability—a calculated mechanism underlying tumor progression. J Mol Med (Berl). 2007 Feb;85(2):139-48. doi: 1007/s00109-006-0133-6. PubMed PMID: 17180667.
  14. To KK, Sedelnikova OA, Samons M, Bonner WM, Huang LE. The phosphorylation status of PAS-B distinguishes HIF-1α from HIF-2α in NBS1 repression. EMBO J. 2006 Oct 18;25(20):4784-94. doi: 1038/sj.emboj.7601369. PubMed PMID: 17024177.
  15. Koshiji M, To KK, Hammer S, Kumamoto K, Harris AL, Modrich P, Huang LE. HIF-1α induces genetic instability by transcriptionally downregulating MutSα expression. Mol Cell. 2005 Mar 18;17(6):793-803. doi: 1016/j.molcel.2005.02.015. PubMed PMID: 15780936.
  16. Koshiji M, Kageyama Y, Pete EA, Horikawa I, Barrett JC, Huang LE. HIF-1α induces cell cycle arrest by functionally counteracting Myc. EMBO J. 2004 May 5;23(9):1949-56. Epub 2004 Apr 8. doi: 1038/sj.emboj.7600196. PubMed PMID: 15071503.
  17. Huang LE, Bunn HF. Hypoxia-inducible factor and its biomedical relevance. J Biol Chem. 2003 May 30;278(22):19575-8. doi: 1074/jbc.R200030200. PubMed PMID: 12639949.

to page top

Last Updated: 9/4/19