Matthew Williams
Assistant Professor of Pathology
B.A. Brigham Young University
Ph.D. Emory University
matthew.williams@path.utah.edu
Matt Williams' PubMed Literature Search
Research
Following viral or bacterial infection, numerous components of the immune response play a role in recognizing, engaging and eradicating the offending pathogen. T cells are particularly central to protection from a wide variety of infections. Protective T cell responses are characterized by the following features, among others: i) the ability to recognize specific determinants of the infecting pathogen; ii) the ability to divide rapidly and expand to large numbers upon activation triggered by pathogen recognition; iii) migration to specific sites of infection; iv) the production of soluble growth and stimulatory factors, called cytokines, that are crucial for host defense and antibody production; and v) the ability to directly recognize and eliminate pathogen-infected cells. A final hallmark of a protective T cell response is the long-lived (in many cases life-long) persistence of memory T cells that specifically recognize the pathogen. Because memory T cells persist at high frequencies and recognize the pathogen much more quickly than naïve T cells, they are able to provide rapid protection upon encountering the same pathogen a second time. While many successful vaccines of the past have relied on the development of antibody responses or their protective effect, future disease challenges will require the induction of cell-mediated protection provided by T cells.
Most T cells that are activated in response to an infectious challenge die once the pathogen is cleared. However, a small proportion survives and populates the memory T cell pool. My lab is focused on understanding the fate decisions that occur early in the response to infection that promote the development and function of these long-lived memory T cells. To accomplish this, we employ models of acute viral or bacterial infection in mice in which we can track in vivo T cell responses and pinpoint the events that selectively promote memory T cell differentiation. We have previously discovered a crucial role for the cytokine Interleukin-2 (IL-2) in the differentiation of protective memory T cells. Memory T cells generated in the absence of IL-2 signals are unable to provide adequate protection to a secondary infection with the same pathogen. These findings have led us to conclude that IL-2 provides a critical signal during T cell activation for the development of functionally responsive memory T cells. Our current research focuses on the molecular nature of the memory differentiation signal that IL-2 delivers to T cells.
A second major arm of research in my lab is to determine the cell-intrinsic signals required for the differentiation of memory T cells. Following activation, T cells begin to divide rapidly can undergo up to 50,000-fold expansion. As the pathogen is cleared, ~5-10% of the effector cells transition into memory cells. While much of the memory differentiation signal is cell-extrinsic and driven by growth factors and cytokines, we are testing the hypothesis that cell-intrinsic signals, mediated by the unique T cell receptor (TCR) expressed by each T cell, plays a central role in determiniung and shaping the memory T cell repertoire. We are using deep sequencing and retroviral expression approaches to track the fate of individual T cells within the anti-pathogen response to determine the extent to which the strength of the TCR signal during activation influences long-term fate within the memory T cell pool.
References
1. Shakya A, Kang J, Chumley J, Williams MA, Tantin D (2011) Oct1 is a switchable, bipotential stabilizer of repressed and inducible transcriptional states. J Biol Chem, 286(1):450-9
2. Kim C, Williams MA (2010) Nature and nurture: T-cell receptor-dependent and T-cell receptor-independent differentiation cues in the selection of the memory T-cell pool. Immunology, 131(3):310-7
3. Mitchell DM, Ravkov EV, Williams MA (2010) Distinct roles for IL-2 and IL-15 in the differentiation and survival of CD8+ effector and memory T cells. J Immunol, 184(12):6719-30
4. Mitchell DM, Williams MA (2010) An activation marker finds a function. Immunity, 32(1):9-11
5. Ravkov EV, Williams MA (2009) The magnitude of CD4+ T cell recall responses is controlled by the duration of the secondary stimulus. J Immunol, 183(4):2382-9
6. Williams MA, Ravkov EV, Bevan MJ (2008) Rapid Culling of the CD4(+) T Cell Repertoire in the Transition from Effector to Memory. Immunity, 28(4)533-545
7. Williams MA, Bevan MJ (2007) Effector and memory CTL differentiation. Annu Rev Immunol, 25:171-92
8. Williams MA, Tyznik AJ, Bevan MJ (2006) Interleukin-2 signals during priming are required for secondary expansion of CD8+ memory T cells. Nature, 441(7095):890-3
9. Williams MA, Holmes BJ, Sun JC, Bevan MJ (2006) Developing and maintaining protective CD8+ memory T cells. Immunol Rev, 211:146-53
10. Williams MA, Bevan MJ (2005) Cutting Edge: A single MHC class Ia is sufficient for CD8 memory T cell differentiation. J Immunol, 175:2066-2069
11. Williams MA, Bevan MJ (2004) Shortening the infectious period does not alter expansion of CD8 T cells but diminishes their capacity to differentiate into memory cells. J Immunol, 173(11):6694-702
12. Sun JC, Williams MA, Bevan MJ (2004) CD4+ T cells are required for the maintenance, not programming, of memory CD8+ T cells after acute infection. Nat Immunol, (9):927-33
Updated 4/13/2012


